Skip to content
Case study · Incident response

From first alert to full attribution.

How ParityBit Security contained a targeted breach against a mid-sized Canadian firm, and rebuilt their human defences in the 90 days that followed.

February 2026 6 pages Anonymised under NDA

Client name, sector specifics, and identifying details have been withheld at the client's request under a mutual non-disclosure agreement. All figures are drawn from the engagement record.

At a glance
Client
Mid-sized professional services firm, Canada
Sector
Legal / advisory (anonymised)
Engagement period
Managed detection since October 2025; incident response activated February 2026
Platforms in play
Vector SIEM · Threat Atlas · ZeroPhish
Time to containment
Under 72 hours from first alert
Material data loss
None
Regulatory breach notifications
None triggered
Phishing resilience
Click rate reduced from 22% to under 5% in one quarter
ParityBit didn't just stop the attack. They told us who was behind it, how they did it, and how to make sure it doesn't happen again.

That is the difference between a vendor and a partner.
Chief Information Security Officer, client firm

The situation

Our client is a mid-sized professional services firm headquartered in Canada. Like many firms in their sector, they sit on a rich vein of confidential client information; and like many firms their size, they had invested in good foundational controls but lacked the 24/7 detection capability and threat intelligence depth of a much larger enterprise.

That gap was the reason they had brought ParityBit on in the first place. Since October 2025, their environment had been continuously monitored by Vector, our AI-powered unified SOC platform, as part of a managed detection engagement. Telemetry from identity, endpoint, cloud, email, and network layers flowed into a single correlated view, with our analysts on watch around the clock.

On the morning of Friday, 6 February 2026, that investment earned its keep. Vector's correlation engine raised a cluster of high-severity alerts against the Finance team's cloud tenant: improbable-travel sign-ins, a short chain of mailbox forwarding rules that no one on staff had configured, and a quiet sequence of outbound transfers timed to avoid the client's legacy thresholds. By the end of that afternoon the incident had been formally activated. By Monday, 9 February 2026, we knew what had happened, who was behind it, and what to do next.

How we found it: Vector SIEM.

The most important thing to understand about this engagement is that nothing here was a scramble. We did not arrive on-site, install a SIEM, and hope to see something. Vector had already been watching for four months. The incident was not discovered because someone got lucky. It was discovered because the architecture did exactly what it was designed to do.

Vector is a multi-layer detection platform. Each layer does a different job, and no single layer alone would have caught this attack. Together, they did.

Prioritised Alert SOC Analyst Response
AI Correlation Engine
behavioural baselining · adversary TTPs · IOC matching
Normalisation & Enrichment
schema unification · user & asset context · threat-intel tagging
Identity
IdP · MFA · SSO
Endpoint
EDR · host logs
Cloud
M365 · AWS · GCP
Email
gateway · rules
Network
FW · DNS · proxy
Vector SIEM's multi-layer detection pipeline: the architecture that raised the alert on 6 February 2026.

At the bottom of the stack, Vector continuously ingests telemetry from every layer of the client's environment: identity, endpoint, cloud, email, and network. In the middle, a normalisation and enrichment layer turns that raw data into a common language and adds context: which user, which asset, which known indicator. Above that, an AI correlation engine learns what normal looks like for this specific client and compares every new event against behavioural baselines, adversary tactics, and real-time indicators of compromise. At the top, only the signal that matters reaches a human analyst.

On 6 February, it was the combination that did the work. A single impossible-travel sign-in would have been ignored by most tools. A single mailbox rule would have been missed. A single outbound transfer would have slipped under the threshold. Vector saw all three happen to the same user, in the same hour, on the same tenant, and raised a single, prioritised alert with the full chain already assembled.

That is what "multi-layer detection" actually means in practice. Not a dashboard full of green ticks. A story, told in one alert, about an attacker who had been patient.

What we learned: Threat Atlas.

Detecting the attack was the beginning. Understanding it was the next step, and understanding, for a boardroom, means being specific. "We saw a phishing campaign" is not an answer anyone can act on. This is:

As soon as Vector had surfaced the chain of indicators, we pushed them into Threat Atlas, our AI-driven threat intelligence platform. Threat Atlas does not simply catalogue indicators; it correlates them across an APT and threat-actor attribution engine, real-time dark web surveillance, and an industry-specific attack matrix. In 3 hours and 20 minutes, it returned a structured intelligence package.

Indicators
147 IOCs ingested
Dark web feeds
underground sources
Sector telemetry
cross-victim patterns
THREAT ATLAS
AI Intelligence Core
APT Attribution
Dark Web Surveillance
Industry Attack Matrix
APT cluster match
94% confidence
MITRE ATT&CK TTPs
14 techniques mapped
Peer campaigns
3 prior, 18 victims
Leaked credentials
9 exposed, 2 still valid
Threat Atlas correlated the incident's indicators against its own intelligence graph: returning an attribution-ready package in under four hours.
Sample indicators (representative)
  • adobesign[.]pl AiTM phishing kit (e-signature lure)
  • sapconcur[.]sa[.]com EvilProxy infrastructure (expense-report lure)
  • sharepoint[.]za[.]com Credential-harvest landing page
  • o365-*-mfa-*[.]{pl,cv,sa.com} Domain pattern (MFA-bypass reverse proxy)
Defanged. Cluster & lure infrastructure match publicly-tracked EvilProxy / AiTM phishing operations reported by Okta Threat Intelligence and Microsoft.

The numbers re-framed the conversation for the client's leadership. This was not a freak event:

  • 94% of the 147 indicators matched a single financially motivated cluster Atlas had been tracking since late 2024.
  • 14 MITRE ATT&CK techniques were identified across initial access, credential access, collection, and exfiltration, all consistent with the same operator profile.
  • 3 prior campaigns against peer firms in the same sector matched the pattern, with 18 confirmed victim organisations across Canada and the US Northeast over the preceding 14 months.
  • 9 leaked credential sets tied to the client's domain were surfaced from underground markets, of which 2 were still valid at the time of the breach, the probable initial access vector.

It was the last two bullets that mattered most. The client had been partially exposed on the dark web before the attack itself began, and the operator behind it was one that ParityBit already knew by name. That reframing gave the client's legal and cyber-insurance teams exactly what they needed: attributable, evidenced intelligence, delivered in a structured report.

For a leadership team who had never before had a named adversary, that clarity was a turning point. It moved the conversation from panic to plan.

How we hardened them: ZeroPhish.

Every forensic trail led back to the same first move: a single well-crafted phishing email, opened by a single employee. The technical controls had done their job once Vector was in place; the missing layer was human. We deployed ZeroPhish, our advanced phishing simulation and awareness platform, across the entire organisation, running every engagement through the same four-stage cycle, plan, deliver, coach, measure, so that every simulated attack produces both training and telemetry.

01
Plan
  • Campaign Builder
  • Audience Segments
  • Privacy Controls
02
Deliver
  • SMTP & API
  • Hosted Landings
  • Click Tracker
03
Coach
  • JIT Micro-Training
  • IR Drill Rooms
  • Gamification
04
Measure
  • Risk Scoring
  • Analytics Dashboard
  • SIEM Feed to Vector
ZeroPhish's four-stage cycle: each simulated attack produces both a training moment and measurable risk telemetry that feeds Vector SIEM.

The first campaign, deliberately modelled on the actual lure that had breached them, produced a 22% click rate, a number that quieted the boardroom. Three months later, after targeted simulations paired with integrated micro-training, the click rate had fallen to under 5%, and employee reporting of suspicious emails had climbed from 9% to over 60%.

The client now runs ZeroPhish campaigns quarterly, paired with incident response tabletop exercises. Muscle memory, not just policy.

The platform play

Vector SIEM saw the attack: in minutes, not months.

Threat Atlas named the adversary and surfaced the exposure that enabled them.

ZeroPhish made sure the same first move could not succeed a second time.

Detection. Intelligence. Resilience. One vendor. One timeline.

Outcomes

  • Breach contained in under 72 hours from first alert.
  • Zero material data loss; no regulatory breach notifications triggered.
  • Full adversary attribution delivered to legal, insurance, and (where appropriate) law enforcement.
  • Ongoing 24/7 managed detection via Vector SIEM, with mean-time-to-detect reduced from days to minutes.
  • Phishing resilience improved more than fourfold in the first quarter; reporting rate improved more than sixfold.
  • ISO 27001 and PCI audit posture preserved without remediation delay.

Why it mattered

The question we are most often asked by boards and executive teams is not a technical one. It is simply this: "If something goes wrong, will we actually be able to handle it?"

For this client, the answer turned out to be yes, but only because the right platforms, the right intelligence, and the right partner were in place before the incident, not after.

That is what we mean when we say cybersecurity that actually works.

Want the full PDF? Diagrams included.

The downloadable PDF contains the same narrative plus the three architecture diagrams (Vector SIEM pipeline, Threat Atlas correlation, ZeroPhish four-stage cycle).